Routledge  
 
Instructors' Resources
Chapters
About The Book
About The Author
Home | Help  
Review  |  Practice Quiz  |  Flash Cards  |  Participation Activity   |  Weblinks


Chapter Fifteen: Identity Politics: Nationalism And Ethnicity

Review

This chapter highlights the role of culture and identity in global politics. The chapter begins by defining identities and how they shape political behavior. It then examines how political elites can manipulate identity to pursue political objectives. The chapter then looks at nationalism, one of the most significant political identities in global politics. This is followed by an examination of religious, ethnic, and tribal identities all of which have regained significance as of late. The chapter turns to the breakup of Yugoslavia to demonstrate how identities can lead to conflict. It ends with an analysis of the idea that we are entering an era in which civilizational identities will become a source of conflict.

1. Identities

Identities are those features that somebody recognizes as defining his- or herself and that, when shared with others, define a group. Each individual has multiple identities, each with its own set of political interests.

a) Conflicting identities and the threat to national unity

  1. For much of the past three centuries, people viewed citizenship as their principle political identity. In recent decades, other identities have gained salience: ethnic, tribal, and religious identities in particular, but also newer identities like gender, race, and profession.
  2. For some countries, conflicting identities pose a growing problem. In Europe, large majorities of Muslim migrants are alienated from Western culture and think of themselves as Muslims first and citizens of their country second.
  3. Many European states, including France and Britain, are confronting challenges to what it means to be “French” or  “British.”
b) Divided loyalties?

  1. People have many identities, but few are politically salient at any given time. An identity only assumes importance when a political issue affects members of a political group.
  2. Sometimes issues force individuals to choose between competing identities.
c) “We” versus “them” in global politics

  1. People are united by common identities and one of the most basic facts in global politics is that the world is divided into groups that often mistrust one another.
  2. In-groups are moral communities in which members feel strongly obligated to one another but not to non-members. In-groups often blame out-groups for their woes.
  3. This mistrust can be a source of conflict. Many of today’s most intractable conflicts involve people in competing identity groups. The greater the psychological distance between these groups, the more likely they will come into conflict with one another.
d) State erosion and technological change

  1. The pace of technological change in recent years has made it increasingly difficult for the state to foster a unifying national identity.
  2. Nonstate groups use technologies like the Internet to mobilize groups they claim to represent, often against existing regimes. These technologies allow groups to operate across national boundaries.
  3. Such technologies also undermine local cultures, sometimes triggering a backlash against globalization.

2. Manipulating identities

a) Increasingly, political leaders are able to manipulate people’s identities—commonly through rituals, myths, and parades—to increase their political power and to mobilize their followers.

b) Bosnia and Chechnya are cases where identities have been manipulated to foster identity wars.

3. Nationalism

Nationalism is the most important political identity. It is based on the belief that the world is divided into distinctive “peoples” and it is borne in the minds of the people.

a) The bases of nationalism

  1. A sense of nationalism may involve shared features such as language, common history, ethnicity, and religion.
  2. Nationalism has taken various forms:
    1. Liberal nationalism in the tradition of Mazzini,
    2. Malignant nationalism as represented by Treitschke in the nineteenth century and, in the twentieth century, by fascism and Nazism.
b) Nations, states, and nation-states
  1. Beginning in the late eighteenth century, nationalism reinforced state-based identities creating what are called nation-states.
  2. Recent decades have witnessed a separation of nation and state, and nations like that of the Kurds can threaten the integrity of existing states.

4. Religious identities

a) Religion has historically played a major role in global politics.

b) Religious identities, especially Islamic fundamentalism, today constitute a major challenge to state-based loyalties.

5. Ethnic and tribal identities

a) Tribal and ethnic identities have proliferated since the end of the Cold War, and have produced an upsurge in global violence.

b) These identities threaten the integrity of states in both the developing and developed worlds.

6. The brutal break-up of Yugoslavia

a) The violent destruction of Yugoslavia into Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Macedonia represents one of the bloodiest cases of ethnic conflict in recent decades.

b) Yugoslavia collapsed under the weight of ethnic wars, first in Bosnia and then in Kosovo, where NATO forces expelled Serbian troops who had engaged in extensive ethnic cleansing of Muslim Albanians.

7. The clash of civilizations?

a) Ethnic violence among Bosnian Muslims, Croats, and Serbians in Bosnia encouraged Samuel Huntington to put forward a theory about clashing civilizations.

b) Huntington believes that interstate warfare in the West is being replaced by wars among competing civilizations, that Western dominance of global politics will be threatened by an alliance between Confucian and Islamic civilizations, and that American values have been eroded by an influx of Hispanic immigrants.

c) Historically, however, clashes between civilizations are less common than the exchange of ideas and culture between them.

Focus Questions

Q1       What are identities, and are multiple identities a threat to national unity?

A1      Identities are those features that somebody recognizes as defining his- or herself and that, when shared with others, define a group. Everyone has multiple identities, each with its own set of political interests. Multiple identities can pose a threat to national unity, but identities generally do not become politically salient until some political issue affects members of a group, as when the French government banned headscarves in schools. When an identity is threatened in this manner, people may be forced to choose between identities. Conflict may ensue between groups, particularly if groups perceive they are in competition for access to the state or economic resources. Identity is also more likely to threaten national unity if political elites attempt to manipulate identity with the intention of causing disunity or even war.

Q2       What is nationalism, and how did it emerge as a key identity in global politics?

A2      Nationalism is the belief that a nation should be recognized as such, should enjoy equal rights with other nations, and should have political autonomy or independence. Nations exist in peoples’ minds and are invented by people who believe they share some common traits with others “like them.” Nationalism emerged as a key identity in global politics with the French Revolution, which instituted the idea of popular sovereignty—that people were owners of the state in which they lived. Nationalism reinforced the power of states, because in nation-states, the people felt like they belonged and the interests of the ruler and the ruled (they believed) were one in the same. Over time, the borders of nations and states did come to correspond, often after long and bloody wars. In the modern era, nationalism gained strength with US President Woodrow Wilson’s efforts after World War I to promote national self-determination, or the idea that distinct nations should rule themselves from within their own state. The prospect of independent statehood has fueled nationalism among the Kurds in Turkey and Iraq and the Albanians in Kosovo.

Q3      Other than nationalism, what other identities are growing in importance in global politics?

A3      Religious, ethnic, and tribal identities are also growing in importance in global politics. Religion has historically played a significant role in global politics. Many modern states attempt to use religion to promote their legitimacy and to co-opt identities that might threaten loyalty to the state. Increasingly, religious identity does compete with state citizenship as a person’s primary loyalty. Today, religious fundamentalism, and especially Islamic fundamentalism, poses a serious challenge to many states. In contrast, ethnic and tribal identities are based on the belief that members are linked by blood ties related to family and kinship. These ties may or may not be real. Ethnic and tribal identities are strongest in countries that were formerly European colonies and where state boundaries do not correspond to the boundaries of ethnic and tribal groups.

Q4      How did clashing identities destroy Yugoslavia?

A4       Yugoslavia was a large, multiethnic federation created from the remnants of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Yugoslavia’s post-World War II leader, Josip Broz Tito, managed to repress conflicting national identities. His successors did not exercise political control as well and these identities began to resurface after his death in 1980. Slobodan Milošević, who became president of Serbia in 1989, turned to Serbian nationalism to consolidate his rule. He advocated the creation of a greater Serbia that included parts of Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Macedonia. Fearing Serb ambitions, several of Yugoslavia’s republics declared independence. The Serbs used military force, first, to try to prevent the breakup of the country and, then, to gain as much territory as possible for Serbia. Initially, Serbia fought a war with Croatia to gain control of land inhabited by Serbs along Croatia’s border with Serbia. The fighting then spread to Bosnia and tore apart Bosnia’s Muslim, Croat, and Serb communities. The Bosnian civil war only ended with foreign military intervention. Serbia’s ambitions also ignited another war in Kosovo in 1999. The population of this territory was predominantly Albanian (and Muslim) but Serbian nationalism claimed the territory as Serb. Milošević revoked Kosovo’s autonomous status (granted in the 1970s), and implemented policies to force Albanians out. Both sides turned to arms and this conflict also only ended with foreign military intervention.

Q5       Are we witnessing a "clash of civilizations"?

A5       Samuel Huntington’s “clash of civilizations” thesis stated that with the end of the Cold War, conflicts would no longer be fought over ideology. Instead, the flashpoints of global conflict are likely to arise where different cultures meet. On the surface, the argument is compelling, and some observers cite the War on Terror as evidence in support of it. However, there are several flaws in the argument that lead one to conclude that we may not, in fact, be witnessing a “clash of civilizations” today. First, it is unclear precisely what a civilization is. In some cases, it is based upon religion and in others ethnicity. Second, in recent years a number of conflicts have arisen between countries within the same civilization, like Iran and Iraq. Third, there are internal divisions within each of Huntington’s civilizations and strong alliances exist among states of different civilizations. Finally, evidence does not support the claim that civilizations will clash whenever they come into conflict. Moreover, if one examines the purported clash between the West and Islam, evidence does not support the claim that the clash is occurring over political values. Rather, traditional realist and liberal explanations of conflict—contiguity, power, and the combination of democracy and interdependence—seem to offer better explanations of interstate conflict than does the clash of civilizations thesis.
Privacy Policy   Terms and Conditions